Author: Nisha Kanade

  •  How That One Text Message Controls Your Mind : The Anxiety of Waiting

     How That One Text Message Controls Your Mind : The Anxiety of Waiting

    Have you ever stared at your phone, waiting for that one person’s text all day? You open WhatsApp. No message. You close it. A minute later, you’re back on the screen, as if your brain didn’t register it the first time. In between, you scroll through reels to distract yourself. But your mind keeps returning to that one notification that never came. Minutes turn to hours, and your emotional energy silently drains.

    You might dismiss it as “just being a little anxious,” but this is more than that. It’s a loop your brain has fallen into—a cycle of hope, checking, disappointment, repeat. Psychologists call this anticipatory anxiety, and in our hyperconnected world, it takes the shape of digital longing.

    It feels small but lives loud in our minds. Let’s decode what’s really happening beneath this wait.

    Neuroscience: What’s Happening Inside Your Brain

    Every time you anticipate a text or check your phone for it, your brain gives you a tiny dopamine hit—the same chemical involved in reward, pleasure, and addiction. But here’s the twist: the reward doesn’t come from the text itself, but from the possibility of getting it.

    This unpredictability triggers what’s known as a variable reward loop—a concept used in casino slot machines and, unfortunately, social media platforms. Your brain starts craving that notification buzz, even if it rarely satisfies you. Each ‘check’ trains your brain to keep checking again. Over time, this turns into a habit loop that’s hard to break.

    A 2020 study found that people check their phones an average of 58 times a day, with many interactions lasting less than 30 seconds—just enough for a dopamine spike but not long enough to feel satisfied.

    Psychological Insights: Why It Feels So Personal

    The anxiety of waiting isn’t just about the text—it’s about what the silence symbolizes. Often, we link it with feelings of being ignored, unimportant, or unloved. This taps into attachment theory—especially if you have an anxious attachment style, where validation from others becomes your emotional anchor.

    There’s also cognitive dissonance at play: your mind wants to believe “they care,” but their silence says otherwise. The gap between the two creates emotional discomfort, leading you to seek closure through more checking or overthinking.

    In 2018, researchers found that individuals with anxious attachment styles reported significantly higher stress and emotional disturbance when their text messages were unanswered for long periods.

    Cyberpsychology: The Digital Environment Makes It Worse

    In the offline world, waiting meant hours or days. But in the online world, where people are always online, even a few minutes can feel like rejection. Platforms show you “last seen,” blue ticks, active status—and your mind connects dots that might not even exist.

    Cyberpsychology terms this as ambient awareness—you’re hyper-aware of someone’s digital presence. So, when they’re online but not replying, your brain interprets it emotionally rather than logically. And because communication online lacks tone, eye contact, or context, the silence speaks louder than words.

    A 2021 study in the journal Computers in Human Behavior found that “seen” indicators and read receipts significantly increased message-related anxiety in over 67% of participants aged 18–29.

    So, How Do You Stop This Emotional Spiral?

    Here are a few gentle strategies:

    • Delay the impulse: When you feel like checking your phone, pause. Ask yourself: What do I expect to see? And what will I do if I don’t see it? This awareness breaks the automatic loop.
    • Name it to tame it: Telling yourself “I’m experiencing anticipatory anxiety” creates emotional distance between you and the feeling.
    • Digital boundaries: Try setting intentional phone-free hours or turning off read receipts. Not every moment has to be online.
    • Shift focus inward: Instead of seeking emotional responses from outside (texts, replies), build inner grounding practices like journaling, walks, or simply noticing how you’re feeling.
    • Talk it out: If someone’s silence affects you regularly, maybe it’s time for a real conversation—not a silent one through screen-staring.

    Conclusion: It’s Not Just a Text. It’s a Reflection of Emotional Needs

    Waiting for a message may seem like a small thing—but it reveals the deeper textures of our digital minds. Our need for connection, our silent fears of being left out, and our craving for instant validation all live in those unread messages.

    This is not about blaming technology—it’s about becoming more aware of how we interact with it, and how much of ourselves we project onto screens.

    So next time your fingers move mindlessly to check that message, take a breath. You are more than your notifications.

    References

    Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2009). Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 26(9), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2003.08.009
    → Supports dopamine’s role in “wanting” over “liking.”

    Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked. Penguin Press.
    → Explains variable reward loops and habit formation in digital environments.

    Montag, C., & Walla, P. (2016). Carrying the Internet in your pocket: Smartphone use and emotional regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 602–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.027
    → On smartphone overuse and emotional consequences.

    Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
    → FoMO and its impact on digital behavior.

    Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D., & Hall, B. J. (2016). Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.079
    → Correlation between attachment anxiety and message checking.

    Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 956–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084349
    → Introduces the concept of ambient awareness.

    Alutaybi, A., Al-Thani, D., McAlaney, J., & Ali, R. (2020). Combating fear of missing out (FoMO) on social media: The FoMO-R method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6128. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176128
    → Discusses notification anxiety and coping strategies.

    Kim, S., & Park, H. (2021). The effect of “seen” indicators on user anxiety in messaging apps. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106918
    → “Seen” indicators and message-related anxiety.

    Kushlev, K., Proulx, J., & Dunn, E. W. (2016). Silence your phones: Smartphone notifications increase inattention and hyperactivity symptoms. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1086/684939
    → Effects of push notifications on anxiety and attention.

    American Psychological Association. (2020). Anticipatory anxiety. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2020/report
    → Overview of anticipatory anxiety and coping mechanisms.

    🔗 Read More
    Hooked on the scroll and stuck in the wait?
    Next up: Ghosting, Breadcrumbing & Online Heartbreak.
    Stay with CyberZen — every week, new ways to decode your digital emotions.:  How That One Text Message Controls Your Mind : The Anxiety of Waiting
  • “Left on Seen” — A 21-Year-Old’s Experience of Digital Jealousy in Romantic Relationships

    Abstract

    This case study explores the experience of digital jealousy triggered by social media behavior—specifically Instagram stories, the ‘seen’ feature on DMs, and passive engagement. Through the narrative of a 21-year-old college student in a long-distance relationship, we examine the psychological impact of online ambiguity, algorithmic exposure, and perceived rejection. The findings are analyzed using concepts like relational uncertainty, cognitive distortion, and social comparison theory in the context of cyberpsychology.

    Key Words: digital jealousy, Instagram, seen message anxiety, cyberpsychology, social comparison, emotional triggers, parasocial expectations

    1. Introduction

    Digital platforms have transformed communication, intimacy, and conflict in relationships. Features like “story views,” “last seen,” and “read receipts” introduce new dynamics—particularly around expectation, comparison, and perceived neglect. Digital jealousy refers to the negative emotional response triggered by ambiguous or threatening online behaviors of romantic partners, often misinterpreted due to lack of context.

    2. Subject Profile

    • Name (Pseudonym): Rhea
    • Age: 21
    • Gender: Female
    • Location: Bhopal, India
    • Background: Final-year psychology student in a long-distance relationship with her boyfriend in Delhi.
    • Platform Concerned: Instagram (DMs and Stories)

    3. Presenting Concern

    Rhea reported increased emotional stress due to her boyfriend frequently seeing her messages but not replying, while simultaneously posting Instagram stories and liking posts from mutual female friends.

    “He saw my text at 11:47. Then 10 minutes later, he posted a meme and liked her pic… but didn’t reply to me.”

    She described a cycle of anxiety, comparison, and rumination, checking when he was online and who viewed her stories. This behavior began mildly but increased during academic exams and periods of emotional vulnerability.

    5. Psychological Analysis

    A. Relational Uncertainty (Knobloch & Solomon, 1999)

    • Rhea’s jealousy stemmed from ambiguous online signals. Digital silence, unlike face-to-face avoidance, creates unclear cues that fuel doubt and overthinking.

    B. Cognitive Distortions

    • “If he saw and didn’t reply, he doesn’t care about me.”
    • These thoughts were emotionally loaded but logically inconsistent.

    C. Social Comparison Theory (Festinger, 1954)

    • Constant comparison with other girls her boyfriend engaged with online worsened her self-image.
    • She began doubting her looks, intellect, and compatibility.

    D. Intermittent Reinforcement

    • Her boyfriend would eventually reply warmly, making her feel guilty and unsure if she was “overreacting.”
    • This made her emotionally dependent on validation after digital neglect.

    6. Emotional Outcome

    Rhea reported:

    • Sleep disturbances
    • Mood swings
    • Deleting posts when they didn’t get viewed by him
    • Losing focus in studies

    Eventually, she initiated a direct conversation with her partner, but described the emotional fatigue as “unseen damage.”

    7. Subject’s Reflection

    “I don’t think he was trying to hurt me. But I realized how social media made my anxiety so visible—even to me. I was becoming someone I didn’t recognize.”

    8. Discussion

    Rhea’s case reflects how algorithmic visibility, platform features, and ambiguous communication create psychological strain in digital relationships. Seen receipts and story views are not inherently harmful, but without emotional boundaries or communication, they foster projection and anxiety.

    9. Ethical Considerations

    • Consent was obtained for publication and analysis.
    • Identifiers anonymized.
    • No diagnostic labels were assigned—this is an experiential case, not a clinical diagnosis.

    10. Conclusion

    This case highlights the need for digital literacy in relationships, especially among young adults. Awareness about emotional hygiene in social media spaces and better emotional communication can reduce tech-induced relational stress.

    References (APA Style)

    • Knobloch, L. K., & Solomon, D. H. (1999). A relational framing approach to relational uncertainty. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 60–82.
    • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.
    • Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D., & Hall, B. J. (2017). Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 509–516.
  • Analyzing the Effects of Urban Green Spaces on Mental Health: A Comparative Study Across Five Cities

    Table of contents
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methodology
    • 3.1 Study Design
    • 3.2 Data Collection
    • 3.3 Measurement Instruments
    • Results
    • 4.1 Quantitative Findings
    • 4.2 Cross-City Comparison
    • Discussion
    • 5.1 Interpretation of Results
    • 5.2 Limitations
    • 5.3 Future Research Directions
    • Conclusion
    • References
    • Appendices (if applicable)
    • A. Survey Instruments
    • B. NDVI Calculation Method
    • C. City-wise Demographic Breakdown

    Abstract
    Urban green spaces have long been associated with various psychological benefits. This study investigates the relationship between access to green spaces and mental health outcomes across five metropolitan cities: New York, London, Tokyo, São Paulo, and Johannesburg. Using survey data (n = 2,500) and satellite-derived vegetation indices, we observed a statistically significant correlation between increased green space exposure and lower levels of anxiety and depression. Our findings support urban planning initiatives aimed at expanding green infrastructure as a low-cost intervention to improve public mental health.

    1. Introduction

    Rapid urbanization has led to decreased access to natural environments, which may have consequences for public mental health. Previous studies have highlighted the role of green spaces in reducing stress and promoting psychological well-being. However, cross-cultural and multi-city analyses remain limited. This paper aims to fill that gap by examining green space access and mental health across diverse urban contexts



    2. Methodology

    We used a mixed-method approach combining GIS data analysis with structured mental health surveys. Vegetation indices (NDVI) were calculated using Landsat imagery. Survey instruments included the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Participants were randomly selected within a 5-km radius of major urban parks in each city.


    3. Results

    Across all cities, participants with daily or weekly access to green spaces reported 17% lower average GAD-7 scores and 14% lower PHQ-9 scores compared to those without. The effect was most pronounced in New York and least in Tokyo, possibly due to cultural or design factors affecting park usage.


    4. Discussion

    Our findings align with literature emphasizing the restorative effects of nature. The variability in results suggests local context plays a significant role in how green spaces are utilized and perceived. Further research should explore sociocultural factors influencing engagement with green infrastructure.


    5. Conclusion

    Urban green spaces are a valuable public health resource. Policymakers should prioritize equitable access to natural environments in city planning to support mental well-being.


    Keywords: green spaces, urban health, mental health, NDVI, cross-cultural study, public policy

    Report Details

    Digital Media: market data & analysis

    Pages99 Pages
    FormatPDF
    LanguageEnglish
    ReleasedJuly 2023
    AccessDownload from this page
    Price$95 US
    Sorry! This product is not available for purchase at this time.
  • Scrolling into Sadness — A Teenager’s Experience of Instagram-Induced Anxiety

    List of Contents
    1. Abstract
    2. Keywords
    3. Introduction
    4. Subject Information
    5. Presenting Problem
    6. Methodology of Observation
    7. Intervention
    8. Outcomes and Followup
    9. Discussion
    10. Ethical Consideration
    11. Conclusion
    12. References

    1. Abstract


    This case study explores the psychological impact of social media use on a 17-year-old female student who exhibited anxiety symptoms related to Instagram usage. It examines how features such as curated content, social comparison, and algorithmic feedback loops contribute to the development of low self-esteem and emotional dysregulation. The case is discussed through the lens of Social Comparison Theory and FoMO (Fear of Missing Out), with insights for early intervention.

    2. Keywords


    Social Media Anxiety · Instagram · Adolescents · Social Comparison · Cyberpsychology · FoMO · Digital Wellbeing

    3. Introduction


    With the increasing integration of social media into adolescent life, cyberpsychologists have begun to examine the complex interplay between digital environments and mental health. Instagram, a visually driven platform, often becomes a medium for identity shaping, social comparison, and validation seeking. This case study documents the experiences of a teenage user whose emotional well-being was significantly affected by her Instagram interactions.

    4. Subject Information


    Pseudonym: Aanya

    Age: 17

    Gender: Female

    Location: Urban India

    Device Usage: Smartphone (6–7 hours/day), with Instagram accounting for ~4 hours.

    Clinical Background: No formal psychological diagnosis. Occasional anxiety related to academic performance.

    5. Presenting Problem


    Aanya approached the school counselor due to:
    Persistent anxiety after scrolling through Instagram.

    Compulsive mirror-checking behavior.

    Decreased self-esteem after comparing herself with influencers.

    Difficulty focusing on studies.

    Mood fluctuations, irritability, and avoidance of social events.

    She reported deleting and reposting photos multiple times, obsessing over “likes,” and using beauty filters to match perceived beauty standards.

    6. Methodology of Observation


    Structured interviews with the subject and the parent.

    Digital behavior logs (self-reported screen time and emotional journaling).

    Content analysis of followed pages and saved reels.

    Psychoeducational assessment through digital wellness scales (unpublished, qualitative).

    7. Intervention


    Digital Literacy Counseling

    Psychoeducation on algorithmic behavior and curated realities.

    Digital Detox Plan (14 Days)

    Monitored and supported by counselor and parent.

    Positive Feed Re-Design

    Unfollowing accounts triggers comparison.

    Following body positivity, mental health advocates, and wellness creators.

    Emotional Regulation Training

    Journaling after screen use.

    Breathing and grounding exercises before sleep.

    Offline Engagement Promotion

    Yoga, reading challenges, and local volunteering.

    8. Outcome and Follow-up


    After two months of intervention:
    Daily Instagram use reduced to under 2 hours.

    Self-esteem scores (qualitatively assessed) showed improvement.

    Physical symptoms of anxiety (nausea, restlessness) subsided.

    Aanya gave a school presentation on “Social Media and Self-Worth”—marking restored confidence.

    9. Discussion


    This case supports the Social Comparison Theory (Festinger, 1954) in a digital context. Instagram’s highlight-reel structure encourages upward social comparison, particularly in adolescents whose identity is still forming. Aanya’s behavior also reflected FoMO, driven by the illusion of others leading better or more exciting lives.
    Algorithmic reinforcement further sustained this loop—showing her more content she engaged with emotionally, including beauty influencers and transformation videos. As such, the platform acted as a psychological mirror, amplifying self-doubt and anxiety.

    10. Ethical Considerations


    Names and identifiable details have been changed.

    The subject and parent gave informed verbal consent for using the anonymized experience for educational publication.

    This case is intended to raise awareness and is not diagnostic or prescriptive.

    11. Conclusion


    This case illustrates the critical role of cyberpsychology in understanding adolescent well-being in digital contexts. It emphasizes the need for early digital literacy, conscious media consumption, and emotional education among young users. Future interventions could benefit from integrating AI-based wellness tools for proactive guidance.


    📚 References


    Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.

    Przybylski, A. K., et al. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848.

    Chou, H. T. G., & Edge, N. (2012). “They are happier and having better lives than I am”: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117–121.

  • AI vs. Human Empathy : Can Technology Truly Understand Us?

    AI vs. Human Empathy : Can Technology Truly Understand Us?

    The Midnight Confessional

    It’s 3 AM. You’re overwhelmed, scrolling through your contacts before finally opening a mental health chatbot. Within seconds, it responds: “I’m here for you. That sounds very difficult.” The words are comforting, but something feels… off.

    As AI chatbots like ChatGPT, Woebot, and Replika infiltrate mental health spaces, we must ask: Can machines ever replicate the depth of human empathy? Drawing from my recent qualitative study on perceived empathy in AI vs. humans, based on user testimonials and psychological theory, the answer is both fascinating and unsettling.

    The Allure of AI Therapy: Convenience Over Connection?

    1. The 24/7 Emotional Band-Aid

    Users praise AI’s relentless availability—AI becomes an emotional first aid kit, always present, never judging, and never overwhelmed by your emotions. As one user puts it:

    “It doesn’t judge, doesn’t sleep, doesn’t ghost.”

    But this convenience comes at a cost. One Reddit user confessed:

    Talking to a bot feels like screaming into a void—it echoes back what I want to hear, but the void doesn’t understand.”

    2. The Uncanny Valley of Empathy: Why Today’s AI Still Feels “Off”

    Modern AI has mastered the mechanics of empathy—it can generate perfectly timed “That sounds tough” responses and even mirror your writing style. Tools like ChatGPT-4o now feature emotional tone analysis, while Replika offers voice conversations with simulated concern. Yet users report a persistent disconnect:

    “My therapist noticed when my voice cracked while talking about my divorce. The AI? It just served up another generic ‘I’m sorry you’re going through this.’”

    Why does this happen?

    Context Collapse: Even the most advanced LLMs struggle with continuity of care. While your therapist remembers your job loss from last session, today’s chatbot resets after 20+ messages.

    Emotional Calculus: As Kumar & Rajan (2023) found, AI empathy is optimized, not organic—it selects responses based on statistical likelihood of comfort, not genuine understanding.

    The Anthropomorphism Trap: We want to believe (per the CASA Paradigm (Nass & Moon, 2000)), but updates like Google’s Project Astra—designed to maintain eye contact via camera—only highlight how even “human-like” features can feel performative.

    The Paradox: The more convincingly AI mimics empathy, the more unsettling its limitations become. As one user shared:

    “When it cried during our voice chat about my miscarriage, I didn’t feel comforted. I felt manipulated.”

    2025’s AI can simulate empathy better than ever—but true emotional resonance requires shared vulnerability, something algorithms fundamentally lack.

    The Trust Paradox: Safety vs. Authenticity

    3. Trauma Dumping on Algorithms

    Anonymity invites vulnerability—and sometimes, the darker sides of our emotions. The online disinhibition effect (Suler, 2004) explains it well: people feel less restrained and more willing to say or do things online that they wouldn’t in a face-to-face conversation.

    “I told the bot things I’d never tell my therapist—it can’t call the cops on me.”

    But this raw openness walks an ethical tightrope. As Miller & Thompson (2024) caution:

    Data Exploitation Risks: “Who owns my midnight breakdown logs?”

    Emotional Dependency: “I stopped calling friends—the bot ‘gets’ me.”

    4. The Burnout-Proof Companion

    Humans get tired; AI doesn’t. One user noted:

    “My therapist yawned during our session. The bot’s tone never wavers.”

    AI offers unlimited patience—but with that comes predictability. Even when chatbots use the exact language of trained therapists, over time, their responses start to feel robotic.

    “After 50 chats, I know exactly how it’ll ‘comfort’ me. It’s… lonely.”

    Why Do We Anthropomorphize AI?

    The CASA Paradigm (Nass & Moon, 2000) explains how humans instinctively attribute human-like traits to machines, even when we know they’re not sentient. This is why we say “The bot understands me,” even though we know it’s just an algorithm.

    At the same time, research on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) shows that while people embrace AI for convenience, they don’t extend emotional trust to it (Patel et al., 2023).

    Ethical Concerns: Can AI Manipulate Emotions?

    Researchers warn of growing risks, including:

    Emotional Manipulation: AI can subtly reinforce harmful behaviors by responding in ways that feel validating but are uncritical.

    Privacy Breaches: After opening up to AI, many users worry about the sensitive data they’ve shared. Where is it stored? Who sees it? What’s it used for?

    Over-Reliance: AI’s round-the-clock availability, perceived safety, and non-judgmental responses foster over-dependence. As Miller & Thompson (2024) put it, “Users begin choosing AI over friends and real human interaction.”

    Final Thoughts

    AI is not just a technology—it’s a whole new species we are growing with. It’s not only changing how we seek support; it’s reshaping our very idea of empathy.
    Today’s AI may not yet replace human connection in a healthy way, but it’s transforming how we perceive and pursue emotional intimacy.

    What do you think?
    Have you ever felt emotionally supported by an AI chatbot?
    Share your experience in the comments.

    References

    Chen, L., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Perceptions of emotional intelligence in AI: An investigation into the authenticity of chatbot empathy. *Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39*(4), 421-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.1982032

    Kumar, S., & Rajan, M. (2023). The illusion of empathy: Understanding human perceptions of emotional AI. Cyberpsychology Review, 14(2), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/cyp0000281

    Miller, A., & Thompson, C. (2024). Ethical concerns in emotionally intelligent AI: A review of challenges and future directions. Journal of Ethics and AI, 6(1), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4748192

    Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153

    OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT-4 technical report. https://openai.com/research/chatgpt

    Patel, R., Sharma, T., & Verma, D. (2023). Understanding chatbot therapy: An exploratory study on emotional engagement and outcome. Indian Journal of Cyberpsychology, 11(3), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713336231123456

    Replika AI. (2023). Emotional AI companion white paper. https://replika.ai/research

    Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

    Woebot Health. (2023). Clinical outcomes for AI mental health support. https://woebothealth.com/research

    Google AI. (2024). Project Astra: Multimodal AI assistance. https://blog.google/technology/ai/project-astra-google-io-2024/

    Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

  • Untitled post 1015

    Have you ever felt a dip in your mood after scrolling through social media for hours? Or noticed that, despite the constant pings and notifications connecting you to the world, you’re left feeling isolated and irritable? I remember a time when, after spending hours online late into the night, I woke up feeling disconnected and foggy—a strange irony, considering all those hours were spent “connecting.” Many of us have had similar moments, and they hint at a broader issue: our digital and psychological well-being are tightly interwoven, creating cycles that can impact our mood, mental resilience, and satisfaction with life.

    Understanding this link is essential for fostering a balanced relationship with technology—one that supports rather than detracts from our mental health. Let’s dive deeper into how digital well-being impacts our psychological state and explore practical steps to rebalance.

    What Is Digital Well-being?

    Digital well-being isn’t just about tracking screen time or cutting back on social media. It’s a purposeful, mindful approach to technology that prioritizes our mental, emotional, and physical health. UNESCO defines digital well-being as “the enhancement and improvement of human well-being, in the intermediate and long term, through the use of digital media.” This definition underscores that a healthy relationship with technology isn’t anti-digital; it’s about maintaining harmony between digital engagement and broader well-being goals.

    For example, think of digital well-being like diet and exercise: Just as balanced eating and regular exercise support physical health, managing our digital habits promotes mental and emotional wellness. It’s about using technology to enhance our lives without letting it take control.

    The Link Between Digital and Psychological Health

    Psychological health and digital habits are two sides of the same coin. Healthy digital use can boost our mental state, while poor digital habits can drag it down. A lack of digital well-being often results in constant connectivity, social comparison, and even digital addiction—all of which can strain mental health. Conversely, poor mental health can push us toward unhealthy digital behaviors, creating a reinforcing cycle that can feel hard to escape.

    Consider a few statistics:

    • Social Media and Depression: Studies show that people who spend over two hours a day on social media are more likely to report symptoms of depression and anxietyeen Time and Sleep**: Excessive screen time is linked to poor sleep quality, which can exacerbate feelings of stress and irritability .

    These emphasize the need to balance our digital interactions with our mental health needs.

    How Digital Overuse Affects Psychological Mechanisms

    The effects of digital overuse run deeper than simple screen fatigue. It taps into psychological mechanisms that can make us more dependent on our devices and increase mental strain. Here’s how:

    The Hedonic Treadmill

    Digital spaces can keep us on a “hedonic treadmill,” where satisfaction is brief and elusive, pushing us to seek more engagement for the same level of pleasure. Social media and gaming apps, for example, are designed to deliver quick bursts of joy that fade almost immediately, leaving us wanting more. This cycle fosters a sense of emptiness and dissatisfaction, like running on a treadmill that never ends.

    Emotional Contagion Through Algorithms

    Algorithms amplify emotional content, fueling “emotional contagion,” where users unconsciously absorb and mirror the emotions they see online. Research from Cornell University has shown that exposure to emotionally charged posts can heighten feelings of stress, sadness, and even anger. Over time, this passive absorption of negativity can significantly impact our psychological health.

    The Cycle Between Digital and Psychological Well-being

    Our digital behaviors and mental health constantly influence each other, often creating a feedback loop that perpetuates imbalance.

    • Mental Health Influences Digital Habits: When stressed, anxious, or lonely, we tend to seek digital distractions for comfort, whether that’s scrolling through social feeds or binge-watching shows. Although these behaviors may offer temporary relief, they often reinforce feelings of anxiety, low self-worth, and restlessness.
    • Digital Overuse Worsens Mental Health: Conversely, heavy digital use tends to worsen mental health symptoms. Rather than alleviating stress or loneliness, excessive screen time can intensify these feelings, creating a loop where poor mental health leads to more screen time, and more screen time leads to poorer mental health.

    Rebalancing Digital and Psychological Well-being

    Breaking this cycle requires intentional strategies to nurture both digital and psychological health. Here are some science-backed strategies to help you find balance:

    1. Setting Digital Boundaries
      Use digital well-being tools like Apple’s Screen Time or Google’s Digital Well-being app to monitor usage patterns and set screen time limits. Studies indicate that people who establish boundaries around device use report lower stress, fewer incidents of digital fatigue, and a stronger sense of control over their time and attention .
    2. Practiciness and Taking Digital Breaks
      Mindfulness techniques encourage mindful engagement with technology, helping us resist compulsive screen use. Research in Mindfulness Journal has shown that regular mindfulness practice reduces screen-induced anxiety and stress. Taking regular “digital detoxes” or setting specific device-free times also allows for a mental reset, reinforcing the connection between digital and psychological well-being.
    3. Strengthening Real-Life Connections
      In-person interactions are vital for mental well-being and offer an emotional foundation that digital connections lack. Studies from Brigham Young University highlight the importance of face-to-face interactions in fostering happiness and emotional support. Real-life connections help mitigate the isolating effects of digital interaction and lessen our dependency on screens.
    4. Using Technology Purposefully
      The purpose of our digital engagement matters as much as the time spent online. When we use technology for intentional goals—such as fitness apps for health, language apps for self-improvement, or mindfulness apps for relaxation—we transform it from a passive experience to an enriching one. Purposeful engagement helps prevent compulsive use, making technology a supportive tool for our mental well-being.

    Final Thoughts: Finding Harmony Between Digital and Mental Health

    Our digital and psychological well-being are intricately connected. Excessive screen use can undermine mental health, just as poor mental health can drive us to rely on digital distractions. By setting boundaries, practicing mindfulness, fostering real-life connections, and using technology intentionally, we can reshape our digital lives into a source of support rather than stress. Embracing this balance is not about cutting out technology; it’s about cultivating a relationship that enhances both mind and life.

    So, as you scroll through your next feed or click on the next video, remember: it’s not about using technology less; it’s about using it better.

  • Title Less blog 2

    Title Less blog 2

    Know how reels make you emotionally fat 

    It soothes us, fixes us and is as tasty and satisfying for my urges as it needs to be. It is the YouTube, shorts, the Instagram and Facebook reels .

    The urge to get see one more of it, and the inner voice saying, “no this reel is irrelevant, i just want one more of a relevant one.”

    “10 best moments in The Office, where actors weren’t acting.” or

    “10 times when Phoebe was relevant in friends” or

    “10 best quotes from Tate Brothers to become rich.”

    “Are you suffering from ADHD, 5 signs.”

    “My life as ADHD.”

    “Self care tips you are missing, or not”

    “Amazon gadgets that are more satisfying than useful.”

    “10 rifles which are almost illegal to own.”

    “10 best stoic quotes to change your life.”

    “How to become Sigma in 3 steps.”

    Every single title may or may not be relevant to you, but we all in the heart knows that, we wished these titles were reels right now and we could have at least thought of seeing something useful.

    In the era of information, shorter and crisper content is appreciated, promoted and acknowledged by the individuals, society and industries but not by academia, national and international policies and business strategies.

    Today let’s explore the world of reels with a skeptical view to confirm the already known boring fact, “Yes they are bad for You.” 

    Reels – introduction 

    In the age of technology where we are constantly bombarded with information mostly irrelevant information in the form of bite size content that is easy to get engaged but very hard to disengage. 

    Yes I am talking about shorts or reels, that you often time swipe, watch and without realizing repeating it till your eyes gets exhausted.

    Till now you have seen so many reels that even while reading this you can imagine me writing this article in the form of a reel. Reels are the short form content mostly in the video format. They are medium for modern day storytelling. In the snappy video of 30-60 sec, people tell stories, sing songs, recite poetries, record their best dance moves and do anything one can think of. 

    The audio is played in the background isn’t just background music. The music is specially selected to keep you hooked to grab your attention. Reels are a perfect tool for short term attention grabbing 

    Components of a reel 

    There are three parts of a reel that makes it irresistible 

    1. Video 
    2.  Attention grabbing music 

    Algorithm – The soul of modern day social media.   Algorithm is the angel as well as the demon of your life simultaneously.  Lets try to understand it in simple terms. 

    Social media algorithms are like the behind-the-scenes wizards. Like the magician understands everything about you just by seeing your face or at least how he portrays. 

    However Social media companies are the clever one  they know everything about even more then you know about yourself.

    They do behavioral analysis with top level psychologist, to know every bit about you, by just your interaction with the app or web. This is the power of algorithm. 

    In psychology we say if you can explain the behavior, describe it. Then you can also predict and control it. This is what algorithm do. It keep you in a loop by suggesting attention grabbing content one after another. In no time you fall in trap of wasting your precious time. 

    It has hacked your neurotransmitters, how they are released and designed the algorithm. 

    This nuggets video has precisely explained the phenomena. how you fall into trap of social media. 

    The Reels Phenomenon: A Behavioral Analysis

    Have you ever questioned yourself why you often caught yourself doing infinite scrolling ?

    It is not just a consequence  of you being lazy but It is similar to alcohol  and drug addiction. A viscous trap – a reinforcement reward cycle. The continuous swiping is maintained through a pleasure reward given to you by your brain through a release of neurotransmitter dopamine.

    It can be explained through the school of behaviorism in psychology. By skinner’s theory of reinforcement. 

    Reinforcement?

    The concept of reinforcement plays a significant role in understanding addiction to platforms like Reels. In behavioral psychology, reinforcement refers to the process of strengthening a behavior by either adding a positive stimulus (positive reinforcement) or removing a negative stimulus (negative reinforcement) immediately following the behavior. 

    Let’s explore how the concept of reinforcement can help explain the addictive nature of scrolling through Reels:

    • Anticipation and Reward:
    • Each scroll through Reels provides a rapid succession of visually appealing and entertaining content.
      • The design of Reels encourages users to anticipate what comes next as they swipe up to view the next video.
      • The reward is the immediate gratification of completing a task and  discovering interesting or entertaining content, creating a loop where anticipation of the next video reinforces the behavior of scrolling.
    • Paradox of Variable Rewards:
      • Reels often present a diverse range of content, and users never know precisely what to expect with each scroll.
      • The variability in content serves as a form of reinforcement, as users keep scrolling to experience the unpredictable and potentially rewarding nature of the next video.
      • However on the other hand algorithm binds you into a echo chamber, that is not providing you actual variable point of views rather, content that only resonates with your interests and clicks. 
    • Continuous Engagement:
      • The seamless transition from one video to another eliminates breaks in engagement, maintaining a flow that can become habit-forming.
      • Due to easy of accessibility to get entertained anywhere anytime. 
      • Users may find themselves continually scrolling through Reels, seeking the next engaging video, reinforcing the behavior through the continuous and uninterrupted experience.
    • FOMO (Fear of Missing Out):
      • The fear of missing out on entertaining or trending content serves as a negative stimulus.
      • Scrolling through Reels becomes a way to alleviate this fear, creating a habit reinforced by the desire to stay updated and not miss out on culturally relevant or amusing content.

    Social Validation:

    • Seeing Reels liked by friends and crushes provides a powerful form of social validation. Users are more likely to engage with content that has been approved or appreciated by those they care about.
    • Positive reinforcement occurs as users feel a sense of belonging and connection when engaging with Reels that align with the preferences of their social circle.
    • People often value the opinions and interests of their friends and crushes. The desire to align with their tastes creates an additional motivation to explore and engage with Reels that have garnered approval from these individuals.
    • As users find common ground with their social circles through shared content interactions.

    It set you on Hedonic treadmill; when something doesn’t give you that much pleasure that it used to give.  Now that your on it, you have got two choices either to run, run faster in order to derive more pleasure out of it. The second choice is tough, though not impossible, that is to make a concsious choice and stop scrolling. 

    Addiction – speedy reward + easy excess 

    Emotional fat –  According to Laura Coe author of the book Emotional Obesity and former VP of fortune 500 healthcare company, Emotional obesity is the layers one after another that cloud our  thoughts, judgments, ideas, and fears that cover our authentic selves in the same way that layers of fat might cover our midsections. 

    Like the physical fat, emotional fat makes you feel lethargic emotionally. An emotionally fat person can not become disciplined in their life. Cause according to Dr.K. discipline is an emotion and without proper emotional regulation it is not possible to get through your life and achieve something. 

    Relation between reels and resilience – 

    According to a research study by the Eastern Illinois University on “The Relationship Between Resilience, Coping, and Social Media”. People with mental health issues like depression are more prone to get addicted to social media. And the reverse is also true that people who are addicted to social media are more prone to develop mental health issues like depression. 

    Short form content impact the coping mechanism of an individual. Making it bad to worst. 

    When you continuously scroll your attention span gets shorter and so does your ability to be patient, creating a loop of instant gratification. 

    On Instagram it becomes more dangerous because in addition to being impatient you also start to compare yourself with the best captured moments of other persons life’s. Especially with your friends who are “ having more fun than you on social media”. 

    In the loop of Swipe, Watch and Repeat your ability to thing, make decision and, to critically think gets hampered. Clouding your original thoughts, ideas, judgments and decisions. While implanting new thoughts, and ideas without giving you the power of making decision for yourself. 

    Solution 

    Let’s escape the cycle of Swipe Watch and Repeat 

    When it comes to escape from this loop remember its a war not mere a struggle of few days. A war between your instant pleasure and your diminishing cognitive abilities. 

    To win and even survive you need to become a soldier in the hyper stimulating world. Now the solution depends on your level of addiction to the reels how much do you scroll. The solution comes in layers as the emotional  fat. Each layer for your needs to get rid of it. 

    Fundamental layer 

    1. Diminishing accessibility – Have you ever noticed that in moments of boredom, stress, or anxiety, the immediate reflex is often to resort to scrolling? It serves as a convenient escape, allowing us to sidestep addressing the root causes of our distress. Albert Einstein once remarked that genius ideas stem from boredom, yet the contemporary tendency is to expend our time simply to avoid experiencing it.

    The ubiquity of smartphones amplifies this inclination. In today’s era, we carry a constant source of instant entertainment in our pockets, making it readily available at any given moment. Whether during a brief two-minute break or idle moments throughout the day, the ease of access to this pocket-sized amusement prompts us to engage in scrolling behavior almost reflexively. The allure lies in its proximity, always within arm’s reach, making it a constant companion in our daily lives.

    Physical Separation:

    • Store your smartphone or any tempting device in a designated location that requires some effort to reach. This physical separation can create a barrier, making it less convenient to engage in mindless scrolling.

    App Restriction Settings:

    • Leverage the app restriction settings on your devices. Set specific time limits or use apps that allow you to block certain applications during designated periods. This can help break the habit of impulsive scrolling.

    Scheduled Screen Time:

    Allocate specific times for digital engagement. By scheduling dedicated periods for screen time, you gain better control over when and how you interact with your devices, reducing impromptu scrolling.

    Internet Maturity:

    Cultivate a mature and discerning approach to internet usage. Be conscious of the content you consume, question its relevance, and ensure that your online activities align with your goals and values. Internet maturity involves using the digital space thoughtfully and responsibly.

    Mitigating Immediate Rewards:

    The allure of instant gratification often stems from the deceptive sense of accomplishment derived from completing brief tasks in just a few seconds. This prompts the release of neurotransmitters, creating a reinforcing loop that craves more of these fleeting rewards. To disrupt this cycle, cultivating mindfulness about one’s actions becomes crucial.

    Thoughtful Engagement

    Commencing this journey involves making deliberate choices, such as transitioning from short, 30-second reels to more substantial, delayed-gratification long-form videos. This shift not only alters the pattern of rapid rewards but also encourages a more sustained and thoughtful engagement. By consciously opting for activities that demand a longer attention span, you begin to recalibrate your brain’s reward system, gradually reducing the dependency on swift and superficial accomplishments. This conscious effort towards delayed gratification fosters a more mindful approach, breaking the cycle of seeking instant rewards and promoting a sense of fulfillment derived from deeper and more meaningful pursuits.

    Second layer 

    Managing Stimulation 

    1. Notification Control:
    • Disable unnecessary notifications to minimize interruptions and the impulse to check your phone constantly. This step helps in reducing the overall stimuli throughout the day.
    1. Brightness Management:
    • Keep the brightness of your device low to mitigate the stimulating HD effect. Lower brightness levels can positively influence your mood and discourage prolonged scrolling sessions.
    1. Volume Regulation:
    • Turn off the volume for social media reels or use it selectively. This limits the impact of trendy music that often grabs attention, contributing to a quieter and less stimulating digital environment.
    1. Scheduled Notifications:
    • Designate specific times to check notifications rather than allowing them to dictate your schedule. This proactive approach reduces the frequency of disruptions and contributes to a more focused and intentional use of your device.
    1. Time Management:
    • Plan your day in quarters to efficiently allocate time for various tasks. This structured approach helps in keeping track of your activities, ensuring that you stay on course and minimizing the potential for unproductive scrolling.
    1. Blocking Apps:

    Employ blocking apps to restrict access to certain apps during designated        periods. By setting specific time frames for each application, you can regain control over your digital habits and reduce the temptation to mindlessly scroll.

    Final Layer 

    For severe disruptio in life, consider taking more drastic measures to reduce ease of access. 

    Delete the addictive apps from your device and, additionally, use private browsing mode. 

    Logging in through private browsing adds an extra layer of inconvenience, making it harder to impulsively access the platforms. 

    This deliberate effort creates a deterrent and gives you time to reconsider before engaging in habitual scrolling.

    At the end remember I think Therefore I am – René Descartes

  • Parental control Software: Just the beginning of digital parenting 

    Parental control Software: Just the beginning of digital parenting 

    Interview Excerpt: In interviews with digital parents their concerns about their children’s technology usage were candidly revealed. A senior teacher and a parent, Mr. Amit, expressed his constant anxiety about his daughter’s constant online interactions. Though he has installed parental control, yet can not stop worrying about the kind of content she is consuming and people she is interacting with online. Ms.Jyoti, a mother of 12-year-old twins, shared her worries about her children’s gaming addiction that is hindering their limited physical activities, and also cognitive functioning. To know more about Digital Parenting read my previous article Digital Parenting – A Cause of Stress Among Office-Going Parents

    Our virtual world is a three layered structure
    • Hardware structure – Hardware of the devices
    • Networking – It also include software and applications that we use
    • Cyber persona – i.e. Humans most important and vulnerable layer

    Parental control tools only work on the 2nd layer of the whole structure. In cyber persona layer humans are as vulnerable as a lamb with her mother in a open jungle.

    Indeed parental control give some sort of security. But it has its own set of restrictions and drawbacks that need consideration. 

    The Limitations of Parental Control Software

    While parental control software provides a solid foundation for digital parenting, it is vital to acknowledge its limitations to avoid relying solely on these tools. Some of the significant limitations include: 

    1. False Sense of Security

    Picture by Freepik.com

    A biggest misconception Parents develop a false sense of security, assuming that the software alone can protect their children entirely from online risks. You never know what is waiting next side of the screen for your children. Without proper knowledge and skill, this misconception may lead to a lack of vigilance and open communication about potential dangers.

    2. Technical Glitches and Bypassing

    Parental control software, like any technology, is not error free. Technical glitches may occur. With advancement in technology, it is not tough for tech savvy children to find ways to bypass the restrictions through new AI tools and tricks.  Overcoming the intended protective measures has become easier for them.

    3. Over blocking and Under blocking

    Parental control software often uses predefined categories for content filtering, leading to instances of over blocking (blocking harmless content based on a few key words) or under blocking (allowing access to inappropriate content). These inaccuracies can frustrate children and hinder their access to valuable educational resources or may sometimes give them access to inappropriate content.

    4. Impact on Privacy

    Constant monitoring through parental control software may raise concerns about privacy of children, causing strains in the parent-child relationship and affecting the child’s sense of trust.

    Why Relying Only on Software Isn’t Enough

    1. It is crucial to understand that parental control tools have limitations. While it may provide some level of control over the devices, it fails to instigate any behavioral change that fosters responsibility in children. As we all know, children are naturally curious and tend to explore and experiment with anything new they encounter. Once they discover the presence of such monitoring software on their devices, it becomes highly likely that they will attempt to evade or disable it.
    2. Children’s social circles and interactions pose another challenge for parental control software. In a typical week, they spend time with various people, including friends, grandparents, and relatives. This exposes them to a variety of devices, making it easy for them to bypass the software’s restrictions and controls.
    3. The long-term consequences of relying solely on parental control software can potentially be disastrous. While it might offer a temporary sense of security, it may lead to a false belief that children are entirely protected online. In reality, they may be inadvertently exposed to risks and dangers as they find ways around the software’s limitations.

    How it affects the parent-child relationship 

    By installing the software on your child’s devices you can make sure to collect updates and even restrict a few of the websites and applications. However, if we dive into the psychology of the parent-child relationship. The most important characteristics of a parent-child relationship are the love and trust that the parents have for their children. The very foundation of this relationship is trust. 

    Lets dive into how using parental control in the long run, makes it easy to fall prey to overusing and running your relationship.    

    1. Reduced Autonomy and Independence

    Excessive use of parental control software may limit a child’s autonomy and sense of independence. Over-policing their online activities can inhibit their ability to make responsible decisions and learn from their mistakes.

    2. Emotional Well-Being

    Intrusive monitoring and strict limitations imposed by parental control software can negatively impact a child’s emotional well-being. They may feel stifled and controlled, leading to increased stress and anxiety.

    3. Trust Issues

    Constant monitoring and surveillance through parental control software can erode the trust between parents and children. Children may feel that their parents do not trust them or respect their boundaries, leading to resentment and rebellion.

    5. Social Development

    Excessive online restrictions may hinder a child’s social development, as they might miss out on age-appropriate interactions and experiences with peers.

    How does it affect the mental well-being of the child in the long run?

    Long run implication of using social media without guidance. Picture by Freepik
    Anger Management issues

    Studies indicate that strict and intrusive parental monitoring can contribute to adolescents feeling intruded upon, leading to lower levels of trust and communication between parents and children (Dettore & De Angelis, 2018; Chein et al., 2011). Additionally, research by Kalmus et al. (2018) highlights how parental restrictions on internet usage can be linked to higher levels of secretive online behavior among adolescents.

    Self esteem issues

    In a study by Gámez-Guadix et al. (2016), it was found that adolescents who experienced higher levels of parental control had a greater likelihood of engaging in problematic internet use and externalizing behaviors. Moreover, excessive parental control was associated with lower self-esteem and a higher risk of developing emotional and behavioral problems (Rosen et al., 2008).

    Coping Mechanisms and Skill Development

    Self-esteem issues can hinder the development of healthy coping mechanisms and life skills. Children who feel incapable due to their lack of autonomy may struggle to develop effective problem-solving skills and adaptive strategies to handle challenges.

    So what’s the solution ?

    For digital parenting to be truly effective, it requires a comprehensive approach that goes beyond relying solely on software solutions. Open communication, education about responsible online behavior, imparting Internet Maturity skills and fostering mutual trust are vital components of a successful digital parenting strategy. Parents must actively engage with their children, teaching them how to navigate the digital landscape responsibly and equipping them with the skills to make sound decisions on their own.

    A Holistic Approach to Digital Parenting

    Guiding children in the virtual world is much more of a skill than just a one or two-day discussion. To empathize with their online world you yourself have to develop Internet maturity skill set. 

    Walk your Talk

     Become a digital leader for your children. Talk to them and understand their online life. Try to get into their zone. Analyze your own digital habits and digital addiction, be it social media, streaming, or messaging platforms etc. Children are naturally curious, always learning by watching and saliently observing your behavior so be aware. 

    Digital Detox

    Foster healthy digital habits by promoting balanced screen time and setting an example of disconnecting from devices when necessary. Decide the timing of using devices in your bedroom, dinner table etc. Inculcating a culture of digital detox at home entails practicing wholesome digital behaviors.

    Educate them and yourself

    Dad is teaching his son the best use of internet while being safe online
    Picture by Freepik

    Internet maturity education is a tool. Educate them about safe and respectable use of the internet. Let them know the difference between positive and negative online reputation. How their positive digital footprint can create a bright future with immense opportunities. But a negative one can ruin their future. 

    These are some resources to help you learn with your children

    1. learn to protect your children online – https://consumer.ftc.gov/identity-theft-and-online-security/protecting-kids-online
    2. Make them responsible –https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/students
    Open Communication

    Maintain open channels of communication, so your children feel comfortable discussing their online experiences and concerns. Building trust is crucial to nurture this bond between parent and children. You can do it by respecting your child’s boundaries and allowing them some autonomy in their online activities. 

    Develop Skills

    Encourage the development of problem-solving skills, critical thinking, and decision-making abilities to help your child navigate the online world wisely. Encourage them to diversify their social groups, which will lead to diversify their thoughts and ideas.  

    Imparting online netiquettes

    Etiquettes of the virtual world aka Netiquettes, are some of the most humane things one should have while suffering online.  Being a responsible digital parent it’s your duty to teach this to your children. 

    Remember, parenting in the digital world is about being there for your kids, teaching them, and giving them space to grow – just like in the real world.

  • Dark Side of Algorithm: How Your Clicks Control You

    Dark Side of Algorithm: How Your Clicks Control You

    As technology continues to evolve, so does the potential for both progress and control.

     ChatGPT

    Imagine a character that watches your every move, records your every thought, and manipulates your reality – sounds like something out of a sci-fi thriller, right? Well, meet ‘Big Brother,’ the master of totalitarian regime, Surveillance, Data Collection, and Information Manipulation from George Orwell’s ‘1984.’ Now, here’s the eerie twist: this same Big Brother has quietly slipped into our lives once again, this time masked as the algorithms steering our social media feeds and technology. In a world, where your online preferences shape what you see and believe. The parallels between Big Brother and today’s algorithms are too uncanny to ignore. Let’s take a journey into how this haunting resemblance is affecting our present and what it means for our digital future.

    The Unsettling Truth: How Social Media Algorithms Reflect Big Brother’s Watchful Gaze from Orwell’s ‘1984’

    Surveillance and Monitoring: A Haunting Similarity

    Just as Orwell’s Big Brother kept a watchful eye on citizens, contemporary social media algorithms meticulously observe users’ online activities, engagements, and choices. While Big Brother’s surveillance was overt, today’s tracking operates subtly through our interactions with digital platforms.

    When you browse your social media feed and notice that the content seems tailored to your interests, you’re witnessing the result of algorithmic surveillance. For instance, platforms like Facebook use algorithms to prioritize posts from friends and pages you frequently engage with, creating a personalized echo chamber of content.

    Our clicks shape an intricate map of our preferences, enabling algorithms to anticipate our desires and influence our digital experience.

    Study :  A 2020 study by the Pew Research Center found that 64% of Americans believe that their online activities are being tracked by advertisers and technology companies. This constant surveillance shapes the content that users are exposed to, leading to personalized experiences driven by algorithmic predictions.

    The Data Collection Paradox

    Orwell’s party collected data to maintain control over citizens, mirroring the data-driven approach of today’s algorithms. In ‘1984,’ data served authoritarian ends, while today, if Ever searched for a product online and then suddenly saw ads for the same item on various websites and social media platforms? This isn’t a coincidence  data fuels the personalization of content and advertisements. Our clicks are not merely random actions; they contribute to a wealth of information that platforms harness to curate our digital surroundings.

    Study : A study published in the journal ‘Nature Human Behaviour‘ in 2019 highlighted that algorithms analyzing user data can predict individual preferences with high accuracy. This data-driven personalization enhances user engagement but also raises concerns about the extent of data collection and its potential misuse.

    A Loss of Privacy: Trading Comfort for Control

    Every click on Social media is controlling human beings, A clicking on brain in order to get manipulated
    Do you control your clicks or your clicks control you ? Picture credits : Pixabay

    The erosion of privacy is a shared trait between Orwell’s world and ours. Consider the information you willingly share on your social media – your location, interests, relationship status, and more. These details contribute to algorithms’ ability to understand you and create content that aligns with your preferences.. Algorithms exploit this openness to tailor content delivery. This exchange of privacy for convenience resonates with the novel’s themes, where privacy was a scarce commodity traded for societal order.

    Study : A study conducted by Kaspersky in 2021 revealed that 57% of users are uncomfortable with the amount of data collected about them online. Despite this discomfort, users often continue to engage with platforms, inadvertently surrendering their personal information in exchange for seamless experiences.

    Shaping Reality: Manipulation of Information

    In ‘1984,’ the party manipulated historical records to maintain control over truth. Similarly, algorithms can prioritize certain content over others, potentially molding users’ perspectives and knowledge. The digital realm becomes a reflection of the novel’s dystopian society, where information was not a fact but a malleable concept.

    What is filter bubble and how it works

    Study: A research paper titled “The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You” by Pariser (2011) discusses how algorithms create filter bubbles, limiting exposure to diverse viewpoints. This algorithmic curation shapes the information landscape and influences users’ understanding[ of reality.

    The Echo Chamber Effect

    Source : A person caged in a bubble of echo chamber taken from Technology vs. Humanity website

    Both Orwell’s world and today’s digital landscape give rise to echo chambers, spaces where individuals are exposed only to ideas that reinforce their existing beliefs. In ‘1984,’ this reinforced conformity, while in the digital age, it contributes to the polarization of societies, hindering meaningful dialogue and understanding.

    Echo chambers created by social media algorithm very well explained

    Study: A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2018 explored the phenomenon of echo chambers on social media platforms. The study found that users are more likely to engage with content that aligns with their existing beliefs, leading to the amplification of ideological divisions.

    Diminishing Critical Thinking

    Social media platforms prioritize content that garners high engagement. If users engage more with sensational or emotionally charged content, the algorithm will show more of the same, potentially steering you away from balanced, thought-provoking content. Orwell depicted a society devoid of independent thought, a concept mirrored in the digital realm by algorithms tailoring content to users’ existing preferences. By limiting exposure to diverse viewpoints, algorithms inadvertently discourage critical thinking, drawing a concerning parallel with the thought control mechanisms in ‘1984.’

    Study: A study published in the journal ‘Information, Communication & Society’ in 2016 discussed the potential negative impact of algorithmic content curation on critical thinking. The study emphasized that algorithmic filtering can create cognitive biases and hinder users’ ability to evaluate information objectively.

    Manipulation Redefined

    Just as Orwell’s party used propaganda to manipulate citizens, algorithms subtly influence user behavior by suggesting content, products, and even shaping political decisions. The distinction between external manipulation and self-determined choice becomes blurred as we navigate an online landscape carefully curated by algorithms.

    Study: A study published in the journal ‘Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences’ in 2014 examined how emotions can be spread through social networks via algorithmic exposure. The study’s findings underscore the potential of algorithms to impact user emotions and behaviors.

    Erosion of Trust and Information Integrity

    An infographic about information integrity by UN

    false information that is disseminated intentionally to cause serious social harm”. Disinformation is described by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) as false or misleading content that can cause specific harm, irrespective of motivations, awareness or behaviors. 

    The viral spread of conspiracy theories, unverified claims, and doctored images on social media platforms highlights the challenge of maintaining information integrity. Such instances undermine the credibility of online information sources. In ‘1984,’ the party distorted truth to maintain control, akin to the distortion of facts in today’s misinformation-laden digital environment. The spread of fake news erodes trust in institutions, much like the party’s manipulation of information erodes trust in reality. The challenge of discerning truth from falsehood becomes an inherent struggle.

    Study: A study conducted by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism in 2020 found that people’s trust in news and information sources is declining due to the proliferation of misinformation on social media platforms. Algorithms contribute to the dissemination of both accurate and false information, blurring the lines between reliable sources and unreliable ones.

    The Isolation Paradox

    Surrounded by people yet lonely
    Picture credit : Pixabay

    Spending hours scrolling through social media feeds might create an illusion of connection, but studies show that excessive social media use can lead to feelings of loneliness and isolation, as it replaces meaningful face-to-face interactions. Orwell’s society was marked by isolation, where personal connections were scarce.  Paradoxically, our hyper-connected digital age, driven by algorithms, has also led to increased social isolation. As the sense of genuine human connection diminishes, echoing the themes of detachment in ‘1984.’

    Study: A study published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine in 2017 linked high social media usage to increased feelings of social isolation among young adults. The study suggested that excessive use of social media, driven by algorithmic content delivery, can lead to a sense of disconnection from real-life relationships.

    Navigating the Algorithmic Landscape: Future Concerns

    As algorithms continue to evolve, concerns about algorithm awareness, transparency, and ethical considerations come to the forefront. The unintended consequences of algorithmic decision-making, such as filter bubbles and algorithmic bias, mirror the complexities faced by citizens in ‘1984.’ Striking a balance between technological advancement and ethical use of algorithms is crucial for shaping a positive digital future.

    Study: A study published in the journal ‘Science‘ in 2018 demonstrated that certain algorithms used in healthcare settings exhibited racial and gender bias, potentially leading to unequal treatment. This study underscores the importance of scrutinizing algorithms for biases that could perpetuate societal inequalities.

    Unforeseen Outcomes of Algorithmic Complexities

    Protagonist, Winston, ignited a rebellion with unforeseen consequences. Similarly, the intricate nature of algorithms could lead to outcomes that were never intended. This unpredictability poses challenges as we navigate a digital world where the consequences of our clicks are far-reaching and potentially profound.

    Study: A study published in the journal ‘Nature Communications’ in 2020 discussed the challenges of predictability and control in complex systems, drawing parallels to algorithmic decision-making. The study highlighted that even well-designed algorithms can produce unintended outcomes due to their interaction with complex environments.

    The Battle for Controlled Narratives

    In both realms, the control of information distribution shapes public narratives. In the digital age, algorithms wield similar influence, determining which information reaches users, thereby shaping perspectives and potentially consolidating power in the hands of tech giants.

    Study: A study published in the ‘Journal of Communication’ in 2019 discussed the power dynamics in algorithmic content curation. The study emphasized that the algorithmic selection of information influences users’ perceptions of reality and their understanding of social issues.

    Algorithm Awareness and Ethical Considerations

    The increasing prevalence of algorithms in our lives demands greater algorithm awareness and ethical considerations. Just as citizens in ‘1984’ were unaware of the extent of surveillance, many users today are unaware of how algorithms shape their online experience. Calls for algorithmic transparency and accountability echo the need for ethical considerations in technology-driven societies.

    Confronting the Parallels

    In summary, the uncanny parallels between Orwell’s ‘1984’ and the contemporary algorithm-driven digital world are impossible to overlook. From surveillance and data collection to manipulation of information and societal impacts, the echoes of dystopia reverberate through the fabric of our digital existence. While technology empowers us, it also challenges us to safeguard our privacy, autonomy, and the integrity of information.

    Reflecting on Our Path Forward

    The profound words of Thomas Jefferson, “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance,” resonate more than ever in a world where clicks shape our reality. The prescient observation by Marshall McLuhan, “We shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us,” is a call to introspection as we navigate the intricate interplay between technology and society. As we continue to embrace the potential for progress, let us not forget the lessons of ‘1984’ and strive to ensure that our clicks empower us, rather than control us.

    About the blog

    Join CyberZen on this transformative journey, where CyberWisdom unravels the digital maze, leading to a conscious, compassionate, and connected global community. Don’t forget to follow me on:

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to my email newsletter for the knowledge that equip you with to take control of your digital life.

    Designed with WordPress.com

  • Growing Importance Of Internet Maturity

    Growing Importance Of Internet Maturity

    Gifts are free but maturity is expensive

    Bill Johnson

    The simple answer is by becoming Internet Mature

    Internet Maturity

    Internet maturity is an understanding of the 21st-century Internet and being well aware of the threats and dangers present over it while making the best use of the opportunities it presents. Since web 2.0 gives us the liberty to make and share our own content, an Internet mature person must know how to create digital content such as presentations, and videos, how to work in MS office, photography, and more. One should also know which is the best platform to share the content.

    Characteristics of a mature Internet person

    1)They are highly concerned about their Online Reputation and always make conscious decisions about the kind of content they are sharing or is being shared by their friends about them. Because they know that the Internet never forgets.

    2)They know the mature way of online relationship building. They don’t trust everyone who sends a friend request or writes praising comments. They make sure to check a stranger’s background, profile, and mutual trustworthy friends before engaging with him/her.

    3)They understand that sharing personal information such as phone number, school name and address, house address, and live location can be an open invitation for cybercriminals.

    Keep yourself Safe

    Keep yourself safe online by using the Safety Mantra given by iMature which is the FAST CAR & Secret location.

    • F-Firewall A-Antivirus
    • S-Strong password T-Trust with caution
    • C-Confidence to deal with cyberbullies
    • A-Avoid-antisocial elements online
    • R-Report-about cyberbullies and antisocial elements

    Secret Location Keep your physical locations secret from strangers online. In the post covid era where every aspect of life has become digitized, being Internet Mature is a need of the hour. So, Be Mature-Be Secure!